Seafood Of India

Blog Post

Shrimp Concerns Shift From Thailand to India: Ethical and Sustainable Sourcing in Focus

The global appetite for shrimp has created a complex issue – balancing affordability with ethical and sustainable practices. While Thailand was once the poster child for these concerns, a new report by the Corporate Accountability Lab (CAL) shines a light on the rise of India’s shrimp industry and the potential issues it presents. India’s Rise and Mirrored Problems: India’s shrimp industry is a recent phenomenon, fueled by the introduction of whiteleg shrimp in 2009. This surge has come at a cost, mirroring the problems that plagued Thailand. CAL’s report, “Hidden Harvest,” reveals potential labor abuses, environmental damage, and the limitations of current certification programs. Labor Abuses a Recurring Theme: The report highlights concerning labor practices in India’s shrimp sector. Long hours, low wages, and unsafe working conditions are common. The system of outsourcing processing to small, unregistered facilities raises red flags for forced labor and exploitation, particularly of vulnerable populations. Environmental Impact a Growing Concern: Modern aquaculture can have significant environmental consequences. India’s shrimp industry is no exception. The construction of shrimp ponds has led to widespread mangrove destruction, impacting biodiversity and coastal protection. Additionally, runoff from these farms contaminates water sources and contributes to antibiotic resistance. Third-Party Certifications Under Scrutiny: The report questions the effectiveness of current third-party certification programs like Best Aquaculture Practices (BAP) and the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC). CAL suggests these certifications might not be adequately detecting or preventing abuses. A Call for Change: The report proposes a multi-pronged approach to address these issues. Major seafood buyers, including retailers and restaurants, need to re-evaluate their sourcing practices. Direct employment of workers with proper documentation and fair wages is crucial. Collaboration with worker-led organizations and enforceable agreements guaranteeing fair treatment are vital steps. Government Action Needed: Governments also have a role to play. India needs to enforce existing labor laws and strengthen regulations to effectively monitor the industry. The U.S. government can play a part by initiating trade investigations and strengthening traceability programs. Additionally, including Indian shrimp on the Department of Labor’s list of goods produced with forced labor would put pressure on the industry to clean up its act. The Future of Sustainable Shrimp: The race to the bottom for cheap shrimp is unsustainable. Consumers and industry players alike need to prioritize ethical and sustainable sourcing practices. Transparency, accountability, and collaboration throughout the supply chain are essential to ensure that the shrimp we enjoy comes at a fair price, not a human or environmental cost.

Read More

Global Seafood Alliance Responds to Media Reports of BAP Standard Violations in India’s Shrimp Industry

March 26, 2024: Letter from GSA CEO Wally Stevens on India Shrimp Situation Speaking for everyone at the Global Seafood Alliance who dedicates their passion and experience to bring about positive change in the seafood industry, the recent reports of worker abuses in India’s shrimp supply chain are upsetting. A vision that we share – one of an industry acting responsibly with regards to its environmental impacts, food safety practices and social accountability – is why many of us chose to work for GSA. It’s also why it hurts so badly for many of us when the results of our efforts are called into question. My message to the seafood industry today is the same as it is to our employees: Be proud of the work that’s been done and be ready for the work that’s to come. Third-party certification is not an “unmitigated failure, hard stop,” as some claimed last week. There is no question that the global seafood industry is in a better place because of the influence of certification schemes like Best Aquaculture Practices. To call for an end to such an important mechanism is a shortsighted response. While third-party certification is a meaningful tool for supply chain managers to have greater insights into the types of operations that they source product from, it does have its limitations. Certification, however, was never going to be a miracle cure or a “golden shield” for all that ails us. It remains an effective device for buyers to vet their supply chains and a powerful incentive for aspirational producers everywhere. When GSA speaks about the need for continual improvement, we don’t only mean the work of seafood producers vying for certification – we hold ourselves to that standard as well. GSA is investigating internal processes, and we are committed to enhancing our standards, wherever and however necessary, and strengthening enforcement efforts wherever possible. When you disengage from a problem you cede your position to help solve it. GSA will not abandon its vision or its responsibilities in any area of the world where this kind of work is sorely needed simply because the challenge is too great. Sincerely, Wally Stevens, CEO March 21, 2024: GSA Issues Initial Response to Reports of BAP Standard Violations in India The Global Seafood Alliance is aware of and actively investigating recent allegations being made against shrimp producers in India, including those holding Best Aquaculture Practices (BAP) certificates. “We are committed to our mission of promoting responsible practices in the seafood supply chain and take these matters seriously,” said Wally Stevens, the CEO of GSA. “BAP requires all certified seafood production facilities – aquaculture farms, hatcheries, feed mills and processing plants – to strictly adhere to robust social accountability, food safety, environmental responsibility, and animal welfare aspects of our global certification standards. Facilities found to have violated BAP standards will have their certifications suspended and potentially revoked.” Credible evidence of a BAP standard violation initiates an investigation, and the procedure is managed by the GSA Program Integrity department with the involvement of specialized and impartial third-party investigators. This process is currently under way to explore the validity of alleged violations that were reported this week by the Associated Press, The Outlaw Ocean Project, and the Corporate Accountability Lab, and to strengthen procedures to help prevent future violations. The organization stands behind the integrity of its standards and feels that these requirements have meaningful positive impacts, and is constantly evaluating the depth and breadth of its certification portfolio. GSA welcomes collaboration with other organizations to not only review the allegations in India, but to also develop and implement improvements for certification processes. BAP standards are maintained under a rigorous internationally recognized process that includes an expert technical committee for standard development, a 60-day public comment period where all comments are reviewed and addressed, and approval by a 12- to 15-member Standards Oversight Committee consisting of one-third academia, one-third industry, and one-third NGO experts. Additional detailed information about the BAP standards can be found here. Assessments are conducted by accredited third-party certification bodies at least once per year. Facilities must meet all standard criteria and correct all non-conformities before certification is granted. GSA monitors FDA import alerts and news reports and investigates all complaints and allegations to safeguard that auditors, certification bodies, and facilities adhere to program requirements. Severe non-conformities and those that are not resolved within a specified timeframe result in suspension from the BAP program. GSA and its standards have developed over time to address a variety of issues and areas for improvement. The organization is committed to its mission to advance responsible seafood practices through education, advocacy, and third-party assurances that the world’s leading retailers, foodservice operators, and all seafood consumers deserve.

Read More