Seafood Of India

Blog Post

Indian Shrimp Exporters Seek Government Support as US Duty Review Nears, Competition Bites

 India’s shrimp exporters are anxiously awaiting a crucial review of US anti-dumping and countervailing duties scheduled to begin next month, urging the Indian government to intervene diplomatically to secure relief amidst fierce global competition. Industry experts highlight that existing US duty calculation methods are detrimental to Indian exporters, who are already battling significant market pressure from competitors like Ecuador and Vietnam in the lucrative American market. Exporters are calling for bilateral discussions between the Indian and US governments to address these concerns. A key point of contention is the US classification of India’s Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exported Products (RoDTEP) and Duty Drawback schemes. “The US authorities consider India’s RoDTEP and duty drawback schemes as incentive schemes, which is not the case. Both are WTO-compliant duty refund schemes only,” explained Yogesh Gupta, a Kolkata-based seafood exporter and Managing Director of Megaa Moda. Furthermore, exporters criticize the US ‘zeroing’ methodology used for calculating anti-dumping duties, arguing it unfairly distorts the dumping margin by not making a fair comparison between export price and normal value. “This needs to be re-looked,” Gupta added, emphasizing the concern within the industry. To bolster their competitiveness, exporters are also requesting the re-introduction of the Transport and Marketing Assistance (TMA) scheme by the Indian government. Beyond the specific anti-dumping (currently 1.8%) and countervailing duties (5.77%), Indian shrimp exports face a baseline tariff of 10% imposed by the US on April 2nd. While exporters received significant relief when the US suspended a potential additional 26% duty, the cumulative effective duty remains substantial at approximately 17.7%. K N Raghavan, Secretary General of the Seafood Exporters Association of India (SEAI), recently urged the government to prioritize securing a “level-playing field” for Indian seafood exports in upcoming trade negotiations before any tariff pauses expire. Competitive pressure is a major factor. Ecuador, facing lower duties and benefiting from geographical proximity to the US, poses a significant challenge. Odisha-based exporter Rajen Padhi, Commercial Director at B One Business House Pvt Ltd, noted that the anti-dumping duty has persisted for two decades and advocated for a uniform rate for India. He also stressed that the RoDTEP scheme’s nature as a tax refund, not a subsidy, can be clearly demonstrated. “As per an international agreement, no taxes should be exported. So now we can convince the US that the RoDTEP scheme is not an incentive scheme,” Padhi stated. The United States remains the most critical market for India’s shrimp industry, absorbing roughly 40% of the country’s total shrimp exports. India exported 7,16,004 tonnes of frozen shrimp globally in 2023-24, with the US importing 2,97,571 tonnes. Other key markets include China, the European Union, and Japan. The sector supports around 100,000 shrimp farms, predominantly located in Andhra Pradesh. As the US review approaches, the Indian shrimp export sector is looking to the government for robust support and diplomatic action to safeguard its position in this vital market. thumb_upthumb_down

Read More

Kerala Trawler Operators Seek Government Lifeline Amid Mounting Debts and Market Shocks

Kerala’s fishing boat operators are urgently appealing to the State government for support as they grapple with a severe financial crisis threatening the viability of the State’s approximately 3,600 trawling vessels. The operators cite a combination of escalating operational costs, crippling debt, and destabilizing international market pressures as key reasons for their plea. Joseph Xavier Kalapurackal, representing the All Kerala Fishing Boat Operators’ Association, highlighted the dire situation, noting that many boat owners are burdened with debts ranging from ₹20 lakh to ₹25 lakh. These debts stem from the high costs of building and maintaining vessels, coupled with daily operational expenses that operators are increasingly unable to recoup. The situation has been significantly worsened by recent U.S. tariffs imposed on Indian seafood. This trade measure has spooked exporters, who have responded by cutting the prices they pay for catches, directly impacting the already strained finances of the boat operators. Furthermore, operators point to persistently high fuel prices, exacerbated by the government’s refusal to reduce the cess on diesel, as a major operational hurdle. While acknowledging climate change as a significant underlying factor impacting fish stocks and operational success, the operators feel immediate government action on controllable costs is necessary. A key point of contention for the boat operators is the perceived disparity in government support. They argue that while seafood exporters benefit from incentives like excise duty reductions and investment subsidies, the primary producers – the boat operators themselves – receive no comparable assistance. They also allege that instead of facilitating their operations, authorities sometimes impede their efforts to catch fish destined for export markets. Adding to their concerns is the government’s policy regarding older vessels. The association is urging officials to reconsider the planned refusal to renew registration and licenses for wooden boats over 12 years old and steel boats over 15 years old. They propose that vessel seaworthiness and efficiency should be determined through individual checks rather than an age-based blanket ban. Facing pressure from multiple fronts, the fishing boat operators are looking to the Kerala government for immediate intervention and a comprehensive support package to navigate the current storm and ensure the sector’s survival.

Read More

India’s Cultivated Meat Breakthrough: Biokraft Foods Unveils Lab-Grown Trout & Chicken, Eyes 2026 Market Launch

In a landmark step toward sustainable food innovation, Mumbai-based Biokraft Foods has unveiled India’s first cultivated seafood prototypes—structured trout fillets grown from cells—and announced plans to seek regulatory approval for lab-grown chicken, marking a pivotal moment in the nation’s alternative protein journey. From Himalayan Waters to Lab Plates: Cultivated Trout Takes Center Stage In collaboration with the ICAR-Central Institute of Coldwater Fisheries Research (ICAR-CICFR), a government-backed body under India’s agricultural ministry, Biokraft has pioneered the cultivation of snow and rainbow trout, prized Himalayan species often threatened by overfishing and ecological strain. Using 3D bioprinting and bioink technology, the startup transforms trout cells into whole-cut fillets, blending them with plant-based and algal ingredients to replicate texture and nutrition. “Conventional trout farming is resource-heavy and environmentally damaging. Our method eliminates reliance on wild catch, antibiotics, and microplastics,” says CEO Kamalnayan Tibrewal. While fetal bovine serum (FBS) is currently used in small quantities, Tibrewal emphasizes the goal is “serum-free production as we scale.” Cultivated Chicken: Regulatory Milestones Ahead By summer 2025, Biokraft aims to file India’s first regulatory application for cultivated chicken with the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). The hybrid chicken product, which mixes lab-grown cells with plant proteins, mirrors conventional meat in taste and texture. This follows India’s inaugural public tasting of cultivated meat in 2024, where attendees sampled a hybrid chicken breast. “A series of tastings begin next month to build consumer familiarity,” Tibrewal adds. Funding, Facilities, and the Road to 2026 Fresh off an undisclosed pre-seed funding round, Biokraft plans to open an R&D and pilot facility by late 2025 to accelerate innovation. The startup targets a 2026 commercial launch for both seafood and chicken, with prices projected to undercut conventional trout as production scales. Government Backing & Industry Momentum The ICAR-CICFR partnership underscores India’s strategic push for sustainable protein. “This collaboration bridges academia and industry to conserve biodiversity while advancing cell-based aquaculture,” says ICAR principal scientist Amit Pande. Biokraft isn’t alone—New Delhi’s Neat Meatt and Singapore’s Umami Bioworks are also forging cultivated seafood partnerships with Indian institutes, signaling a sector-wide shift. A Hungry Market: 60% of Indians Open to Cultivated Meat A 2024 survey reveals over 60% of Indians are willing to try lab-grown meat, with 59% viewing it as a nutritionally secure alternative. Government enthusiasm aligns with consumer curiosity, positioning India as a key player in the global $1.6B cultivated protein market. The Future of Food? As Biokraft navigates regulatory hurdles and public tastings, its mission transcends innovation—it’s a race to reshape India’s food systems. “We’re not just creating meat; we’re crafting a sustainable blueprint for future generations,” says Tibrewal. With Himalayan trout and hybrid chicken leading the charge, India’s cultivated meat revolution is officially underway. Images courtesy of Biokraft Foods | #CultivatedMeatIndia #SustainableProtein #FoodTechInnovation

Read More

India’s Blue Revolution Takes Center Stage: MPEDA Unveils Seafood Expo Bharat (SEB) & Vibrant New Logo

India’s Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA) is set to launch the inaugural Seafood Expo Bharat (SEB) from July 1 to 3, 2025, at the Chennai Trade Centre. This landmark event aims to bring together 150 exhibition stalls and over 2,500 delegates under one roof, marking a significant step in the government’s efforts to promote India’s seafood industry globally. A Premier Platform for India’s Seafood Sector SEB is envisioned as an annual flagship event by MPEDA, India’s nodal agency for seafood exports. It will serve as a dynamic platform uniting hatchery operators, aqua farmers, processing machinery manufacturers, exporters, and international importers. The Expo will facilitate business matchmaking and technical exchanges, reinforcing MPEDA’s commitment to expanding India’s footprint in the global seafood trade. Showcasing India’s Marine Wealth India’s seafood exports reached a remarkable US$7.76 billion last financial year, spanning 123 countries. The country is a leading global supplier of crustaceans, finfish, and value-added seafood products. With rising demand for premium seafood, SEB offers exporters a timely opportunity to engage with buyers and explore new international markets. Symbolizing the Blue Revolution MPEDA has unveiled a vibrant new logo for SEB featuring an orange shrimp, a red fish, and teal-blue waves. This emblem reflects India’s crustacean export strength, nutritional diversity, and commitment to eco-friendly aquaculture. The design aligns with the Blue Revolution initiative, a comprehensive program focused on sustainable development and management of inland and marine fisheries, symbolizing innovation, sustainability, and commerce in India’s seafood sector. Driving Sustainable Growth: Blue Revolution & PMMSY Launched in 2019 with an investment of ₹20,050 crore, the Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana (PMMSY) underpins the Blue Revolution. The scheme aims to boost fish production to 22 million metric tons by 2024–25 and double fishers’ incomes through enhanced productivity and socio-economic welfare. PMMSY focuses on responsible fisheries development, infrastructure augmentation, and modernization of the seafood value chain. Highlights of SEB 2025 The Expo will feature a range of activities designed to promote trade, technology, and culinary excellence, including: Chennai: The Ideal Host for SEB Chennai’s rich coastal heritage, world-class port infrastructure, and status as a leading producer of shrimp and fish make it the perfect venue for SEB. The event highlights Tamil Nadu’s crucial role in India’s Blue Economy vision, which aims to harness ocean resources for sustainable socio-economic growth. Seafood Expo Bharat 2025 promises to be a milestone event, spotlighting India’s marine wealth, advancing sustainable aquaculture, and strengthening the country’s position as a global seafood powerhouse.

Read More

Our Nets Are Empty, Our Voices Ignored: A Karnataka Fisherman’s Plea for Justice on the Vanishing Coast

My name is Raju, and for generations, my family has cast nets into the Arabian Sea from Honnavar, a quiet coastal town in Karnataka. The sea has always been our mother—she fed us, shaped our traditions, and sheltered our homes. But today, as I stand on the shore where my ancestors once taught me to read the tides, I see only despair. Bulldozers roar where children once played, and police batons strike down those who dare to protest. Our cries for justice are drowned by the noise of “progress.” “We Are Told We Don’t Exist” Last February, our world shattered. Hundreds of us gathered to protest a port project that would swallow our fishing grounds and erase our village from the map. The police arrived not to listen, but to silence. Videos of that day show women dragged by their sarees, men beaten bloody, and our homes—marked for demolition—declared “illegal” overnight. “Your land doesn’t exist on any map,” they sneered. How can that be? My grandfather built our hut here. Our gods are carved into these rocks. Advocate B.T. Venkatesh, fighting our case, says the government erased our homes from survey records. “They want us gone,” my neighbor Lakshmi whispers, clutching her newborn. “But where do we go? The sea is all we know.” A Coastline Under Siege From Vadhavan in Maharashtra to Beyt Dwarka in Gujarat, the story repeats. Ports, missile sites, and factories rise like monsters, devouring reefs, mangroves, and fish nurseries. In Kerala’s Vizhinjam, the Adani port turned our brothers’ harbors into death traps. In West Bengal’s Junput, missile tests scatter dried eels—once a lifeline—into the dust. Even Tamil Nadu’s Ennore fishers, choking on oil spills and ammonia leaks, share our fate. Climate change gnaws at our nets too. The fish grow scarce, storms fiercer. But when we beg for aid, the state offers empty hands. “Your sacrifices are for development,” they say. Yet, our children go hungry while trawlers from big companies loot what little remains. Small Hands Feed the World, But Who Feeds Us? My wife, Shanti, works 14 hours drying fish under the sun. Like millions of women, she fuels a hidden economy. The U.N. says small fishers like us catch half the world’s fish in developing nations, feeding billions. But when industrial projects poison the waters, no one counts our losses. “They call us ‘encroachers,’” scoffs Sebastian Rodrigues of the National Federation of Small-Scale Fishworkers. “But without legal rights, we’re ghosts in our own land.” We Demand a Lifeboat: Legal Rights For years, we’ve begged for laws to protect our homes, nets, and futures. Coastal Regulation Zone rules once shielded our beaches, but now they’re bent for hotels and ports. The Forest Rights Act grants tribal communities land titles—why not us? “Our rights must be written into the Constitution,” argues researcher Sisir Pradhan. “Without them, we’re just obstacles to profit.” A human rights-based law could force the state to compensate us when projects destroy our livelihoods. It could let us co-manage fisheries, as we’ve done for centuries. A Storm on the Horizon Last monsoon, my boat capsized in a sudden squall. I survived by clinging to splintered wood. Today, our entire community feels adrift. The port’s surveyors return daily, flanked by police. My sons ask, “Appa, will we fish tomorrow?” I have no answer. Yet, we resist. Women block bulldozers with their bodies. Elders recite old fishing songs to keep hope alive. The FAO says securing our rights is key to ending poverty and saving oceans. But will India listen? A Final Cast Tonight, as waves lick the scars on our coast, I think of my grandfather’s words: “The sea gives, but she also takes. Respect her, and she’ll always provide.” We’ve respected her. Now, we demand respect from those who see us as expendable. Our nets may be empty, but our resolve isn’t. Recognize our rights. Protect our homes. Let us fish—not just for today, but for generations unborn. The tide of “development” must not wash away the people who sustain it.

Read More

Tamil Nadu’s 61-Day Fishing Ban: A Delicate Dance Between Livelihoods and Ocean Conservation

Every year, as summer transitions into monsoon, Tamil Nadu’s bustling coastal regions fall silent. The state’s annual 61-day fishing ban, enforced from April to June, has begun, leaving ports deserted and fishing communities grappling with its economic ripple effects. While the ban aims to safeguard marine ecosystems during critical breeding seasons, it also underscores the fragile balance between environmental stewardship and the survival of thousands of fishing families. The Ban: Timing and ScopeThe prohibition, spanning the Bay of Bengal, Palk Bay, and the Gulf of Mannar, aligns with the peak breeding period for fish and crustaceans. These ecologically sensitive zones, home to endangered species like sea turtles and dugongs, as well as vibrant coral reefs, serve as nurseries for marine life. The 61-day window allows fish stocks to replenish, ensuring sustainable catches post-ban. Mechanized trawlers and motorized vessels are barred from operating, though traditional non-motorized boats are exempt, offering marginal relief to small-scale fishers. Economic Ripples: Ports Fall SilentFor over 1,000 fishing villages along Tamil Nadu’s 1,076-km coastline, the ban spells hardship. Over 10 lakh families, reliant on daily catches, face lost income. Ports like Nagapattinam, Rameswaram, and Thoothukudi, usually teeming with activity, now lie eerily quiet. “Two months without work means no food, no school fees, and mounting debts,” laments K. Rajan*, a fisher from Chennai. Many turn to daily wage labor or migrate temporarily, but opportunities are scarce. Government Aid and Gaps in ReliefTo mitigate the crisis, the state provides Rs 8,000 per family as relief—a sum fishermen argue is woefully inadequate. “This covers just 15 days of expenses. We need at least Rs 15,000 to survive,” says N. Geetha, a fisherwoman leader. Critics highlight that the compensation hasn’t been revised in years, despite rising inflation. While neighboring states like Kerala offer higher aid (up to Rs 9,000), Tamil Nadu’s fishers demand equity and expanded welfare schemes, including subsidized fuel and healthcare. Conservation Gains: A Long-Term VisionMarine biologists and environmentalists champion the ban as a lifeline for India’s overexploited waters. Studies show a 20–30% increase in post-ban catches, vital for a sector contributing 1% of India’s GDP. The Gulf of Mannar, a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve, has seen gradual recovery in seagrass beds and fish diversity. “This breather allows ecosystems to regenerate, benefiting fishers in the long run,” explains Dr. R. Ramesh, a marine ecologist. Striking a Balance: The Path AheadThe ban’s success hinges on inclusive policies. Fisher unions advocate for skill development programs, such as aquaculture or handicraft training, to provide alternate income. Enhanced monitoring via satellite tracking and patrols ensures compliance, deterring illegal fishing. Meanwhile, experts urge long-term strategies like climate-resilient fishing practices and expanding marine protected areas. ConclusionTamil Nadu’s fishing ban embodies a painful yet necessary trade-off. While it strains livelihoods today, its role in securing tomorrow’s seas cannot be ignored. Bridging this divide demands empathy, innovation, and collaboration—a reminder that protecting the ocean ultimately means protecting the people who depend on it.

Read More

India Prepares to Ship 35,000-40,000 Tonnes of Shrimp to US Amid Tariff Relief

India’s seafood exporters are gearing up to send 35,000 to 40,000 tonnes of shrimp to the United States after US President Donald Trump’s decision to pause a planned 26% reciprocal tariff, reducing it to 10%. This move has brought significant relief to the industry, which had been bracing for substantial financial losses. “There is a lot of relief now as we are at par with other exporters to the US. Now the shipments that were held back will be processed,” said K.N. Raghavan, Secretary General of the Seafood Exporters Association of India (SEAI). Approximately 2,000 containers of shrimp, which had been delayed due to tariff uncertainty, are now being prepared for export. Background on the Tariff Situation The US is India’s largest shrimp market by both volume and value, with shrimp exports to the US valued at $2.7 billion in the 2023-24 fiscal year. The planned tariff increase had caused significant uncertainty and concern within the Indian seafood industry. Exporters were particularly worried about the potential impact on their ability to fulfill existing contracts and maintain market share. Current Tariff Structure and Its Implications Despite the pause, Indian shrimp exports to the US still face an effective customs duty of 17.7%, including 5.7% in countervailing duties and 1.8% in anti-dumping duties. This higher effective rate means that Indian exporters continue to bear significant costs under delivery duty-paid arrangements. The 90-day pause provides exporters with a crucial window to fulfill existing contracts without incurring additional costs. Industry’s Concerns and Future Outlook While the temporary reprieve offers some relief, industry leaders emphasize the need for long-term solutions. Raghavan urged the Indian government to focus on securing a “level-playing field” for the country’s seafood exports during upcoming trade talks before the tariff pause expires. “The 90-day pause provides exporters the opportunity to fulfill these orders without the extra cost,” an industry representative said. “However, we need to ensure that we can maintain our competitive edge in the long term.” Conclusion The US tariff pause on Indian shrimp exports provides a much-needed breather for India’s seafood industry. However, the long-term sustainability of shrimp exports to the US will depend on ongoing negotiations and the ability to address underlying trade challenges. As India prepares to ship 35,000-40,000 tonnes of shrimp to the US, the industry remains hopeful for a more favorable trade environment in the future.

Read More

U.S. Tariff Pause Brings Temporary Relief to Indian Shrimp Exporters

In a significant development for India’s seafood industry, President Donald Trump’s decision to pause a planned 26% tariff on Indian shrimp exports, reducing it to 10% until July 2025, has brought temporary relief to Indian exporters. This move allows India to resume shipments of 35,000–40,000 tonnes of shrimp (2,000 containers) to the U.S., avoiding immediate financial losses. Background on the Tariff Situation The U.S. is India’s largest shrimp market by both volume and value, with shrimp exports to the U.S. valued at $2.7 billion in the 2023-24 fiscal year. The planned tariff increase had caused significant uncertainty and concern within the Indian seafood industry. Exporters were particularly worried about the potential impact on their ability to fulfill existing contracts and maintain market share. Immediate Impact of the Tariff Pause The pause in the tariff increase has been welcomed by industry stakeholders. K.N. Raghavan, Secretary General of the Seafood Exporters Association of India, expressed relief, stating that the decision allows India to be on par with other exporters to the U.S. Approximately 2,000 containers of shrimp that were previously delayed due to tariff uncertainty are now being prepared for export. Current Tariff Structure and Its Implications Despite the pause, Indian shrimp exports to the U.S. still face an effective customs duty of 17.7%, which includes 5.7% in countervailing duties and 1.8% in anti-dumping duties. This higher effective rate means that Indian exporters continue to bear significant costs under delivery duty-paid arrangements. The 90-day pause provides a crucial window for exporters to fulfill existing orders without incurring additional costs. Industry’s Concerns and Future Outlook While the temporary reprieve offers some relief, industry leaders emphasize the need for long-term solutions. Raghavan urged the Indian government to focus on securing a “level-playing field” for the country’s seafood exports during upcoming trade talks before the tariff pause expires. The industry is also concerned about the potential impact on other major markets, such as China and the European Union, where Ecuador, a major competitor, faces relatively lower tariffs. Conclusion The U.S. tariff pause on Indian shrimp exports provides a much-needed breather for India’s seafood industry. However, the long-term sustainability of shrimp exports to the U.S. will depend on ongoing negotiations and the ability to address underlying trade challenges. As India prepares to ship 35,000-40,000 tonnes of shrimp to the U.S., the industry remains hopeful for a more favorable trade environment in the future.

Read More

Indian Shrimp Exporters Face ₹600 Crore Loss as US Imposes Additional Tariffs

The recent imposition of a 26% tariff on Indian shrimp exports to the United States has sent shockwaves through India’s seafood industry. With the financial impact of these tariffs estimated at a staggering ₹600 crore, Indian shrimp exporters are grappling with the looming consequences of the US’s decision. This move, part of a broader set of reciprocal tariffs, threatens to severely disrupt the thriving shrimp export sector, with ramifications for producers, consumers, and the broader Indian economy. The Financial Blow: ₹600 Crore and CountingIndia’s shrimp export industry, which has flourished over the years due to the high demand for Indian farmed shrimp in international markets, is now staring at significant financial losses. The 26% tariff imposed by the US government means that Indian exporters will now have to bear higher costs, which could lead to reduced profit margins and, in some cases, loss of market share. The financial impact of this tariff is estimated at ₹600 crore, a substantial figure that highlights the vulnerability of Indian shrimp exporters in the face of global trade disputes. This blow comes at a time when the global seafood market is already under strain due to factors such as climate change, overfishing, and rising operational costs. The US has long been one of India’s largest and most lucrative markets for shrimp, and the tariff hike threatens to upend years of growth and stability in the sector. Shrimp Exports: A Key Industry for IndiaShrimp is one of India’s most valuable seafood exports, contributing significantly to the country’s economy. The shrimp industry employs millions of people, including farmers, workers, and processors, particularly in coastal regions of Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal. India has long been the largest exporter of shrimp to the US, and this relationship has been a cornerstone of the country’s seafood export sector. However, the introduction of the 26% tariff on Indian shrimp represents a serious challenge to this economic pillar. With tariffs now significantly increasing the cost of Indian shrimp, American importers may look to alternative suppliers, such as Ecuador or Thailand, both of which are able to offer lower prices due to more favorable tariff conditions. As a result, Indian exporters risk losing market share in the US, leading to potential long-term financial consequences. The Broader Impact on ExportersThe ₹600 crore loss is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the wider ramifications of the tariff on Indian exporters. Small and medium-sized exporters, who account for a significant portion of the industry, are particularly vulnerable. These businesses often operate on slim profit margins and rely heavily on consistent orders from the US market. The added cost of tariffs could force many of these smaller exporters to either increase prices or reduce exports, both of which could lead to a loss of customers. Additionally, as prices rise due to the tariffs, Indian shrimp may become less competitive compared to shrimp from other countries that are not subject to such high tariffs. The US, being one of the world’s largest consumers of shrimp, offers a highly competitive market, and any increase in the cost of Indian shrimp could easily push American buyers toward cheaper alternatives. In some extreme cases, Indian exporters may be forced to absorb the added costs themselves, further squeezing their profit margins. This scenario could ultimately lead to a reduction in the volume of shrimp exported to the US, causing significant losses in revenue for the industry. Potential Response: Seeking New MarketsFaced with the threat of losing its foothold in the US, India’s seafood industry is exploring alternative markets where its shrimp may not be subject to the same level of tariff scrutiny. Countries in Europe, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East represent potential opportunities for Indian exporters to diversify their business and mitigate the financial fallout from the US tariff hike. India’s government is also expected to engage in diplomatic efforts to address the tariff issue and seek relief through international trade bodies, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO). Negotiations could lead to a reduction or removal of the tariffs, but such a process is likely to take time and may not provide immediate relief for exporters. For now, the focus is on finding new trade routes and opportunities while dealing with the immediate challenges posed by the tariff. Indian shrimp producers will need to adapt to the changing market conditions, and the industry is likely to see shifts in its supply chain and export strategies as it navigates this difficult situation. The Ripple Effect: Job Losses and Economic FalloutThe impact of the US tariff on Indian shrimp exports extends beyond the businesses themselves. The shrimp industry in India provides direct and indirect employment to millions of people. From farmers to processors, workers in the shrimp supply chain are already feeling the pinch as production slows, and export volumes decrease. If the situation continues to deteriorate, job losses could mount, particularly in the coastal regions where shrimp farming is a primary source of income. The economic consequences of these job losses could also affect local economies, with many coastal communities heavily dependent on shrimp exports for their livelihoods. In a country like India, where the informal economy plays a significant role, the loss of income could have far-reaching consequences, not just for workers, but also for local businesses that rely on the shrimp industry. The Future of India’s Shrimp ExportsWhile the immediate impact of the US tariffs is clear, the long-term consequences for India’s shrimp export industry are still unfolding. The ₹600 crore loss is just the beginning, and exporters will need to find innovative ways to adapt to the changing market landscape. To mitigate the effects of these tariffs, Indian exporters will need to diversify their offerings and explore new markets, as well as invest in improving the quality and sustainability of their shrimp farming practices. This shift will require a concerted effort from both the private sector and the Indian government to ensure that the industry remains competitive and resilient

Read More

Ecuador Set to Replace India as Largest Shrimp Supplier to the US Amid Tariff Disputes

In a dramatic shift in the global seafood supply chain, Ecuador is poised to become the largest shrimp supplier to the United States, surpassing India. This change comes on the heels of new US tariffs imposed on Indian seafood, including a significant 26% levy on shrimp, which has created a major ripple effect across the global seafood market. Ecuador, with its lower tariffs and robust shrimp production industry, stands to benefit from the shifting dynamics of international trade, positioning itself as the new leader in US shrimp imports. The Shrimp Wars: How Ecuador Takes the LeadFor years, India has been the dominant player in the US shrimp market, with its farmed shrimp making up a significant portion of American seafood imports. However, the recent imposition of reciprocal tariffs on Indian shrimp has sparked a chain reaction that is reshaping the global seafood supply landscape. As the US places a 26% tariff on Indian shrimp, Ecuador’s seafood industry finds itself with a golden opportunity to step in and fill the gap left by India. Unlike India, Ecuador’s shrimp industry benefits from lower tariffs, making its shrimp more competitively priced in the US market. Ecuador has long been a key player in the global shrimp trade, but the new tariff situation could push it to the top of the list for US shrimp imports. With Ecuador’s shrimp production at an all-time high, and the market conditions more favorable than ever, the country is set to take advantage of the changing tides in international trade. Ecuador’s Strategic AdvantageEcuador’s shrimp industry has been growing steadily over the past few decades, with the country becoming one of the largest producers of shrimp globally. Its warm coastal waters, ideal for shrimp farming, combined with advanced aquaculture technology and sustainable farming practices, have made Ecuador’s shrimp both high-quality and cost-effective. The country’s shrimp industry is largely export-oriented, with the US being one of the largest markets. The government of Ecuador has also been proactive in securing trade agreements and establishing strong relationships with major seafood importers, making it easier for Ecuadorian shrimp to enter the US market without facing the same level of regulatory hurdles that Indian shrimp now faces. Moreover, Ecuador’s shrimp farming practices have been a key selling point for American buyers. The country is known for its responsible and environmentally sustainable shrimp farming methods, which resonate well with the growing demand for sustainably sourced seafood in the US. This has allowed Ecuador to gain an edge in the competitive US market, where consumers are increasingly leaning toward ethically sourced products. The Impact of the US Tariff on Indian ShrimpThe imposition of a 26% tariff on Indian shrimp, part of a larger set of reciprocal tariffs, has thrown the Indian shrimp export industry into turmoil. India has long been a major supplier to the US, with its shrimp accounting for a large portion of the market share. However, the higher tariffs will inevitably drive up the cost of Indian shrimp, making it less competitive compared to other suppliers, particularly Ecuador. For Indian shrimp exporters, the new tariffs mean increased costs, which could lead to reduced profit margins and, potentially, a loss of market share in the US. As Indian producers scramble to find new markets or absorb the increased costs, Ecuador stands ready to step in, offering a more affordable and tariff-friendly alternative to American consumers. The shift in trade dynamics is a significant blow to India, as it risks losing its position as the top shrimp exporter to the US. As a result, Indian seafood exporters are looking to diversify their markets, turning to regions like Europe and the Middle East. However, these markets are not as large or profitable as the US, meaning the loss of American business could have lasting financial consequences for Indian producers. A Changing Landscape for US Shrimp ConsumersThe US is the world’s largest importer of shrimp, and any change in the source of supply can have a major impact on consumers. As Ecuador takes over the largest share of the US shrimp market, American buyers may see an influx of Ecuadorian shrimp at more competitive prices. While the rise in tariffs on Indian shrimp may lead to higher prices in the short term, the increased supply from Ecuador could stabilize prices and provide more options for consumers. US-based seafood distributors and retailers are also likely to benefit from this shift, as they can now source shrimp from Ecuador without the added cost burden of the new tariffs on Indian shrimp. In turn, this could lead to more competitive pricing at grocery stores and restaurants, benefiting consumers in the long run. However, this shift may also lead to a greater emphasis on quality control and sustainability in the shrimp market. As Ecuador ramps up production to meet increased demand, it will need to maintain its high standards of shrimp farming to ensure it retains its competitive edge in the US market. Ecuador’s Economic Boom: Shrimp Industry as a Growth DriverFor Ecuador, this surge in demand for shrimp in the US represents a tremendous opportunity for economic growth. The shrimp industry is already a significant contributor to Ecuador’s GDP, providing jobs to thousands of people in coastal communities and generating billions of dollars in export revenue. As the US continues to seek alternative suppliers to replace India, Ecuador stands to see a major boost in its shrimp export sector. This increased demand will lead to greater investment in shrimp farming infrastructure, research, and technology, further solidifying Ecuador’s position as a global leader in seafood production. The ripple effect will also be felt in related industries, such as shipping, logistics, and processing, as the country ramps up production to meet the growing demand. In addition, the Ecuadorian government may see an increase in tax revenue from the shrimp sector, which could be reinvested in social programs and infrastructure projects. The boost to the economy could also benefit local communities in coastal areas, where shrimp farming provides essential livelihoods. Potential Challenges

Read More

Indian Seafood Exports Reel Under US Tariffs: Shrimp Industry Faces Crisis

In a move that has sent shockwaves through the seafood industry, the United States has announced reciprocal tariffs on seafood imports from India, specifically targeting shrimp and a range of other marine products. This bold decision, which follows months of trade tensions, has raised questions about the future of global trade relations and its potential impact on both consumers and producers. A Deep Dive into the Tariffs The new tariffs will impose a hefty 26% levy on Indian shrimp, along with other seafood products, as part of a broader strategy aimed at balancing trade imbalances and addressing concerns over market access. The timing of these tariffs couldn’t be more critical, as both countries have been engaged in a series of economic exchanges and disagreements, particularly over issues like intellectual property rights, agricultural exports, and market access. For years, India has been one of the largest exporters of seafood to the United States, especially shrimp. Indian shrimp has made its way into the American market as a popular choice due to its quality, cost-effectiveness, and consistent availability. However, with this new set of tariffs, the cost of Indian shrimp will likely rise, leading to a potential shift in consumer behavior and market dynamics. The US and India: A Complex Trade Relationship The relationship between the US and India has always been one of mutual benefit, but not without friction. The seafood tariff comes at a time when both countries have been discussing various trade deals, but also embroiled in disputes over issues like tariff structures on steel and aluminum, agricultural products, and digital trade. The US has expressed concerns over India’s trade practices, claiming that India has been offering its own subsidies to its seafood exporters, which, according to the US, distorts fair competition. India, on the other hand, has long been vocal about the tariffs it faces on various products, arguing that they are disproportionately high and unfair. The country has called for greater market access and has frequently pressed for the removal of tariffs on certain goods to make trade more equitable. However, the US decision to impose these new tariffs appears to be a retaliatory action in response to India’s own trade policies, creating a ripple effect across the global seafood market. Impact on Indian Seafood Exporters Indian seafood exporters are bracing themselves for a major blow, as the new tariffs are expected to make their products significantly more expensive. Shrimp, a $5 billion industry in India, makes up a substantial portion of the country’s total seafood exports. This could have devastating consequences for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in India, which rely heavily on exports to the US. India’s Ministry of Commerce and Industry has expressed disappointment over the tariffs, calling it an “unfair trade practice” that would harm local producers and disrupt a vital source of income for thousands of people employed in the seafood sector. The Indian government is expected to take diplomatic action, possibly engaging in negotiations to resolve the issue and prevent further escalation of the trade dispute. As Indian exporters face the prospect of shrinking profits and a loss of market share in the US, many are seeking alternative markets in Europe, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia. While these markets are growing, they may not offer the same volume or revenue potential that the US market does. US Consumers: Will the Price of Shrimp Rise? One of the immediate concerns for American consumers is the potential rise in the price of shrimp. The United States is the largest importer of shrimp globally, and Indian shrimp accounts for a significant portion of the market. As the tariffs take effect, it’s expected that prices will climb, leading to increased costs for seafood suppliers and, eventually, consumers. This could also lead to a potential decrease in demand, as consumers might seek cheaper alternatives or reduce their overall seafood consumption. US-based seafood suppliers are expected to pass on the additional costs to consumers, though some may try to absorb the costs in the short term in an effort to maintain market share. Larger seafood companies, which can source shrimp from multiple countries, may weather the storm better than smaller, local producers who rely heavily on imports from India. The Ripple Effect on Global Seafood Markets While the direct impact of the tariffs will be felt in the US and India, there are broader implications for global seafood markets. Other countries that export shrimp, such as Thailand, Ecuador, and Vietnam, may see a surge in demand as the US turns to alternative suppliers. However, these countries too could face challenges in meeting the increased demand, especially as the global seafood market is already under strain due to climate change, overfishing, and other environmental concerns. In response to these changes, many global seafood producers are exploring new ways to diversify their offerings and streamline production processes to reduce costs. The rise in tariffs on Indian shrimp could also prompt more investments in sustainable aquaculture and innovation in the seafood industry, as companies look for ways to maintain their competitive edge in the face of shifting global demand. Diplomatic Tensions: What’s Next? The US decision to impose these tariffs on Indian seafood is a sharp reminder of the complexities of international trade in today’s interconnected world. The announcement has set the stage for further diplomatic maneuvering between the two countries, with trade representatives expected to meet in the coming weeks to discuss the future of their economic relationship. In the short term, India may consider retaliatory measures, including tariffs on US goods or calls for disputes to be settled through international trade bodies like the World Trade Organization (WTO). The long-term consequences, however, will depend on how both countries navigate this increasingly tense trade environment. Conclusion The imposition of reciprocal tariffs on Indian seafood exports marks a significant turning point in US-India trade relations. With the shrimp industry at the forefront of this conflict, the ripples of these tariffs will likely be felt far and wide, affecting

Read More

Global Tuna Stocks Surge in Sustainability: Insights from the March 2025 ISSF Report

The latest report from the International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF), released in March 2025, highlights significant strides in the sustainability of global tuna stocks. This update is crucial for understanding the health of tuna fisheries, which are vital for food security and economic stability worldwide. Below, we explore the key findings, potential reasons for improvement, and what this means for the industry and conservation efforts. Key Findings The ISSF’s March 2025 report, titled “Status of the World Fisheries for Tuna,” reveals: This shift is unexpected, as it shows a rapid improvement in stock health, particularly with overfished stocks dropping so significantly, which could influence future fishing policies and consumer choices. Implications The improved sustainability likely benefits the tuna industry by ensuring a stable supply, supporting economic growth in tuna-dependent regions, and enhancing food security, given tuna’s role as a key protein source. For conservation, it suggests that current efforts are effective, potentially reducing the risk to marine biodiversity. Consumers may see increased trust in sustainably sourced tuna, possibly leading to higher demand for certified products. Survey Note: Detailed Analysis of Global Tuna Stock Sustainability Progress Introduction and Context The International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF), a global partnership among the tuna industry, scientists, and environmental organizations, released its March 2025 “Status of the World Fisheries for Tuna” report, also known as the “Status of the Stocks” report. This biannual publication, reviewed by ISSF’s Scientific Advisory Committee, provides a comprehensive analysis of 23 major commercial tuna stocks, focusing on abundance, exploitation/management, and environmental impact (bycatch). The report, published on March 10, 2025, and covered by Undercurrent News on March 17, 2025, highlights significant progress in tuna stock sustainability, with overfished stocks now accounting for just 2% of the global catch, down from 10%, and intermediate stocks at 10%, up from 2% compared to the November 2024 findings. Key Findings and Statistical Breakdown The report’s key statistics, based on the proportion of the global catch, are as follows: Stock Status March 2025 (%) November 2024 (%) Change Healthy Abundance Levels 88 88 No change Intermediate Abundance 10 2 +8 percentage points Overfished 2 10 -8 percentage points Additionally, the report notes that 91% of tuna stocks are not experiencing overfishing, a four-percentage-point improvement since November 2024, indicating reduced fishing pressure on vulnerable stocks. The 2023 catch of major commercial tuna stocks totaled about 5.2 million tons, providing context for the scale of these proportions. This breakdown is distinct from the percentage of stocks by number, where the March 2025 report indicates 65% at healthy levels, 26% at intermediate, and 9% overfished, highlighting the difference between stock counts and catch proportions. Factors Contributing to Improvement Several factors likely contributed to this progress, inferred from ISSF’s broader activities and historical reports: These efforts align with ISSF’s mission to undertake science-based initiatives for long-term conservation, reducing bycatch, and promoting ecosystem health, as outlined on their website. Implications for Industry and Conservation The improved sustainability has multifaceted implications: Comparative Analysis with Previous Reports Historically, the proportion of catch from overfished stocks has varied. In March 2022, it was 9.2%, and in March 2023, 11%, as per ISSF reports. The current 2% is a significant improvement, possibly due to recent RFMO measures and industry compliance, as seen in ISSF’s compliance reports. The increase in intermediate stocks from 2% to 10% suggests a transitional phase for some stocks, potentially moving toward healthy levels, as evidenced by improvements in stocks like Atlantic Ocean/Mediterranean albacore in November 2024 reports. Challenges and Future Outlook Despite progress, challenges remain, such as high uncertainty in monitoring some stocks (e.g., Mediterranean albacore) and ongoing overfishing in specific regions like the Indian Ocean. ISSF’s advocacy for electronic monitoring standards, adopted by the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, aims to address these gaps, as detailed in their blog. Continued collaboration among stakeholders is essential to maintain this trajectory, with ISSF’s interactive tools, like the stock status visualization at this page, aiding transparency and decision-making. Conclusion The March 2025 ISSF report underscores a promising trend in global tuna stock sustainability, with overfished stocks at a record low of 2% and intermediate stocks rising to 10%. This progress, likely driven by enhanced management, sustainable practices, and scientific monitoring, bodes well for the tuna industry, conservation, and consumers. However, vigilance is required to ensure these gains are sustained, with the full report available for download at ISSF’s website for further details.

Read More

Week 13 Shrimp Price Trends: India Gains Momentum as Vietnam Struggles

The global shrimp market remains a dynamic landscape, with Week 13 of 2025 highlighting stark contrasts between two of Asia’s shrimp production powerhouses: India and Vietnam. As reported by Undercurrent News on March 25, 2025, farm-gate shrimp prices in India surged, driven by supply shortages and robust demand, while Vietnam faced a persistent decline, grappling with oversupply and weakening market conditions. These divergent trends underscore the complex interplay of local production dynamics, international trade pressures, and environmental factors shaping the shrimp industry. India’s Shrimp Prices Soar Amid Shortages In India, Week 13 marked a significant uptick in farm-gate prices for Penaeus vannamei shrimp, the dominant species in the country’s aquaculture sector. This increase comes as farmers report reduced harvests, attributed to a combination of disease challenges and adverse weather conditions earlier in the year. The supply shortage has tightened the market, pushing prices upward and offering a much-needed boost to Indian shrimp farmers after a challenging period of low prices in 2023 and early 2024. Industry sources indicate that the price gains were particularly pronounced for larger shrimp sizes, which are in high demand in key export markets like the United States and the European Union. The average farm-gate price for 30-count vannamei shrimp reportedly rose by approximately 8-10% compared to the previous week, reflecting a strong buyer response to the constrained supply. Analysts suggest that this trend could persist into the second quarter of 2025 if production doesn’t rebound quickly, especially with India’s ongoing efforts to diversify its export portfolio into value-added products like cooked and breaded shrimp. The resilience of India’s shrimp sector is notable, given its position as one of the world’s top producers. Despite a projected 12% contraction in vannamei output in 2023, the country has maintained steady export volumes, buoyed by growing Penaeus monodon (black tiger shrimp) production. The Week 13 price surge signals a potential recovery phase, offering hope to farmers who have weathered high input costs and disease outbreaks, such as Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) and White Spot Syndrome Virus (WSSV), in recent years. Vietnam’s Prices Slide Under Pressure In contrast, Vietnam’s shrimp industry faced a continued downward spiral in Week 13, with farm-gate prices for vannamei shrimp dropping further. The decline, estimated at 5-7% week-on-week for key sizes like 40-count shrimp, reflects an oversupply in the domestic market and softening demand from major importers. Vietnamese farmers are reportedly harvesting earlier than planned to mitigate losses, flooding the market and exacerbating the price slump. This downturn follows a difficult 2023, when Vietnam’s vannamei production is believed to have shrunk by up to 15%, according to the Global Seafood Alliance. While a recovery was anticipated in 2024, lingering challenges—such as high production costs, competition from cheaper Ecuadorian shrimp, and fluctuating export demand—have kept prices under pressure. The situation is compounded by Vietnam’s heavy reliance on exports to China and the United States, where buyers have been favoring more competitively priced alternatives. Farmers in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam’s shrimp farming hub, are voicing concerns about profitability. With farm-gate prices dipping below production costs for many, some are opting to delay restocking ponds until market conditions improve. This cautious approach could lead to a supply reduction in the coming months, potentially stabilizing prices later in the year, though the immediate outlook remains bleak. Broader Market Implications The contrasting price trends in India and Vietnam highlight the fragmented nature of the global shrimp market in 2025. India’s gains are a boon for its farmers and exporters, potentially strengthening its position against competitors like Ecuador, which has dominated supply in recent years. Meanwhile, Vietnam’s struggles could cede further market share to rivals unless corrective measures—such as improved disease management or government support—reverse the tide. Globally, shrimp demand is expected to recover unevenly in 2025, with early signs pointing to stabilization in output, as noted by S&P Global. However, the Week 13 data suggests that regional disparities will continue to shape price trajectories. For consumers, India’s rising prices may translate to higher costs for shrimp products, while Vietnam’s decline could offer short-term relief in markets reliant on its supply. Conclusion Week 13 of 2025 paints a tale of two shrimp industries: India riding a wave of price increases fueled by scarcity, and Vietnam battling a persistent downturn amid oversupply. As the year progresses, the ability of each country to adapt to production challenges and capitalize on shifting demand will determine their fortunes in the competitive global shrimp market. For now, India’s farmers celebrate a rare victory, while Vietnam’s industry searches for a path to recovery.

Read More

Indian Seafood Tech Firm Expands with $4.5 Million Investment in Aqua Biologicals

In a significant move to strengthen its position in India’s burgeoning aquaculture sector, AquaConnect, a leading Indian seafood technology company, has announced a $4.5 million (€4.2 million) investment in new research and development (R&D) and production infrastructure in Gujarat. The investment marks a strategic expansion into farm care biologicals, positioning AquaConnect at the forefront of sustainable seafood production technologies. Strategic Expansion into Aqua Biologicals AquaConnect, which has established itself as an integrated supply chain platform in the seafood industry, views this expansion as a natural progression of its business model. The new infrastructure will focus on developing and producing biological solutions that enhance farm productivity, improve water quality, and promote sustainable aquaculture practices. “We’re not just expanding our operations; we’re transforming our approach to the aquaculture industry,” said Rajamanohar Somasundaram, CEO of AquaConnect. “This investment represents our commitment to innovation and our vision to become one of India’s top aqua biologicals companies within the next five years.” State-of-the-Art Facilities in Gujarat The chosen location, Gujarat, is strategically significant due to its growing aquaculture industry and supportive business environment. The new facilities will include: Market Potential and Industry Impact India’s aquaculture sector has been experiencing remarkable growth, with seafood exports reaching 1.78 million tonnes in 2023-24, valued at approximately $7.38 billion. The demand for sustainable and efficient farming solutions has never been higher as the industry faces challenges like water pollution, disease management, and climate change impacts. “The aquaculture industry is at a critical juncture where traditional methods are no longer sufficient,” explained Somasundaram. “Our biological solutions will address these challenges by improving farm productivity while reducing environmental impact.” Creating Science-Backed Solutions AquaConnect aims to differentiate itself through rigorous scientific research and development. Their formulations will be based on extensive testing and validation to ensure they meet the specific needs of Indian aquaculture practices. “We’re committed to delivering products that not only work but can be scientifically proven to enhance farm performance,” said Dr. Meenal Patel, Head of Research at AquaConnect. “Our team of scientists and aquaculture experts will work closely with farmers to develop solutions that address real-world challenges.” Employment and Skill Development The expansion is expected to create numerous employment opportunities in the region, particularly for scientists, technicians, and skilled workers in the aquaculture sector. AquaConnect has also announced plans for training programs to upskill local farmers in the use of biological solutions. Future Outlook With this investment, AquaConnect sets its sights on becoming one of India’s top five aqua biologicals companies. Their growth strategy includes both domestic market expansion and potential international collaborations. Industry analysts view this move as strategically timed, given the increasing global focus on sustainable seafood production and India’s emerging leadership in the aquaculture sector. “The Indian aquaculture market is ripe for innovation, and companies that can provide science-based solutions will be well-positioned for growth,” said industry analyst Anil Kumar. “This investment demonstrates forward-thinking leadership and positions AquaConnect to capture significant market share in the coming years.” As AquaConnect embarks on this new chapter, all eyes will be on how their biological solutions transform farming practices and contribute to the sustainability of India’s seafood industry.

Read More

India’s Seafood Industry Set to Benefit from Turtle Excluder Device Subsidy

In a move poised to revolutionize India’s fishing practices and revive its seafood exports, the Union government is preparing to launch a subsidy scheme for turtle excluder devices (TEDs) in fishing nets. This initiative signals a significant step toward balancing environmental sustainability with economic growth in the nation’s fisheries sector. Background: The US Ban and Its Impact The decision comes six years after the United States imposed a ban on wild-caught shrimp imports from India, citing concerns over the accidental capture of sea turtles in fishing nets. This ban dealt a substantial blow to India’s seafood industry, resulting in an estimated annual loss of US$300 million. While wild-caught shrimp represent only a fraction of India’s total shrimp exports, they hold premium status in international markets and remain crucial for diversifying export portfolios. The Subsidy Scheme: Details and Implementation Under the proposed subsidy program, the cost of installing TEDs will be shared between the Union and State governments in a 60:40 ratio. Each device, which currently costs approximately Rs 25,000, has been developed by the Central Institute of Fisheries Technology (CIFT) and has received approval from US regulatory agencies. Industry sources revealed this development during a recent fisheries business meet organized by CIFT. “The ministry has given strong indications of support for this subsidy,” said one industry representative. “We expect this will significantly accelerate the adoption of TEDs among Indian fishermen.” Environmental and Economic Benefits TEDs are designed to allow sea turtles to escape fishing nets while minimizing the loss of catch. Their implementation is expected to: India’s Seafood Export Landscape India’s seafood exports reached 17,81,602 tonnes in 2023-24, valued at US$7.38 billion (Rs 60,523.89 crore). Frozen shrimp remains the dominant export product, accounting for 40.19% of the total quantity and 66.12% of the dollar value of exports. K. N. Raghavan, Secretary General of the Seafood Exporters Association of India, emphasized at the CIFT event that India must focus on adding more value to its seafood processing capabilities. He also called for additional quarantine facilities to reduce dependence on the country’s single existing center. Industry Reaction and Future Outlook The announcement has been welcomed by industry stakeholders who see it as a positive step toward restoring India’s position in premium seafood markets. “This subsidy represents a win-win solution,” said one exporter. “It addresses environmental concerns while creating opportunities for our fishermen and processors.” The government’s move is expected to strengthen India’s compliance with international fishing standards and potentially serve as a model for other nations facing similar challenges in balancing fisheries productivity with marine conservation. As India continues to implement such innovative solutions, the path forward for its seafood industry appears promising—one where economic growth and environmental stewardship can coexist and mutually reinforce each other.

Read More