Seafood Of India

Welcome to India's first Exclusive Seafood Portal

  • contact@seafoodofindia.com
Facebook Instagram Twitter Youtube

Welcome to India's first Exclusive Seafood Portal

  • contact@seafoodofindia.com
Menu

Blog Post

editor
Export Fisheries International Shrimp
0
11

US Import Ban on Indian Wild-Caught Shrimp: A $500 Million Loss and Its Impact on Fishermen’s Livelihoods

The United States has imposed a ban on the import of wild-caught shrimp from India, citing concerns over the use of turtle excluder devices (TEDs) in Indian fishing vessels. This move has resulted in a significant loss of approximately $500 million for the Indian seafood industry, with far-reaching consequences for the livelihoods of thousands of fishermen and their families. Background on the US Import Ban The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has been monitoring the use of TEDs in Indian fishing vessels for some time. TEDs are devices that allow turtles to escape from fishing nets, thereby reducing the bycatch of sea turtles. The US has strict regulations regarding the use of TEDs in fishing vessels, and any country that fails to comply with these regulations can face import bans. Impact on the Indian Seafood Industry The US import ban on Indian wild-caught shrimp has had a devastating impact on the Indian seafood industry. The US is one of the largest markets for Indian seafood, and the ban has resulted in a significant loss of revenue for Indian exporters. According to industry estimates, the ban has resulted in a loss of approximately $500 million, which is a significant blow to the Indian seafood industry. Impact on Fishermen’s Livelihoods The US import ban on Indian wild-caught shrimp has also had a significant impact on the livelihoods of thousands of fishermen and their families. Many fishermen in India rely on the export of wild-caught shrimp to the US as a major source of income. The ban has resulted in a significant reduction in their income, making it difficult for them to support their families. Efforts to Address the Issue The Indian government and the seafood industry have been working together to address the issue of the US import ban on Indian wild-caught shrimp. The government has been in talks with the US authorities to resolve the issue, and the industry has been working to implement measures to ensure compliance with US regulations. Implementation of TEDs One of the key measures being implemented by the Indian seafood industry is the use of TEDs in fishing vessels. The industry has been working to ensure that all fishing vessels are equipped with TEDs, which will help to reduce the bycatch of sea turtles and comply with US regulations. Certification Programs The Indian seafood industry has also been working to implement certification programs that ensure compliance with US regulations. These programs include the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certification, which is a globally recognized standard for sustainable fishing practices. Impact on the Environment The US import ban on Indian wild-caught shrimp has also had an impact on the environment. The ban has resulted in a reduction in the amount of wild-caught shrimp being exported to the US, which has helped to reduce the pressure on wild shrimp populations. However, the ban has also resulted in an increase in the amount of farmed shrimp being exported to the US, which has raised concerns about the environmental impact of shrimp farming. Conclusion The US import ban on Indian wild-caught shrimp has had a significant impact on the Indian seafood industry and the livelihoods of thousands of fishermen and their families. The industry has been working to address the issue by implementing measures to ensure compliance with US regulations, including the use of TEDs and certification programs. However, the ban has also raised concerns about the environmental impact of shrimp farming, and the industry must work to ensure that its practices are sustainable and environmentally friendly. Future Outlook The future outlook for the Indian seafood industry is uncertain, and the industry must work to address the challenges posed by the US import ban on Indian wild-caught shrimp. The industry must continue to work to ensure compliance with US regulations, and it must also work to address the environmental concerns raised by the ban. With the right measures in place, the industry can recover from the ban and continue to thrive in the global market. Recommendations Based on the analysis, the following recommendations are made: By implementing these measures, the Indian seafood industry can recover from the US import ban on Indian wild-caught shrimp and continue to thrive in the global market.

Read More
editor
Export Fisheries
0
50

Goa’s Seafood Exports Decline by 14% Amid Global Challenges and Shifting Consumer Preferences

Panaji: Goa’s seafood exports, which had been on a steady rise over the past five years, faced a significant setback in the 2023-24 fiscal year, with a 14% decline in export volumes. After reaching a peak of 63,333 tonnes worth ₹1,00,761 lakh in 2022-23, the export figures dropped to 55,167 tonnes, generating ₹93,420 lakh in 2023-24, according to data from the Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA). Experts attribute this decline to a combination of global pressures, including fluctuating market demands, regulatory shifts, and the lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on consumer preferences. “The global seafood market is undergoing rapid changes, especially in the post-pandemic era, where consumer preferences have shifted significantly,” noted Prof. Anantha Sreepada, a retired senior principal scientist at the National Institute of Oceanography (NIO). He pointed out that these changing preferences have led to a reduction in the minimum quantities of certain seafood items in the overall export basket. Sreepada emphasized the need for the industry to adapt to these evolving consumer demands to bridge the 14% export gap. “To sustain and grow, the industry must cater to the new consumer expectations in the global seafood market,” he added. The decline in exports has also been linked to geopolitical factors. Maulana Ibrahim, president of the Seafood Exporters Association of India (Goa region), highlighted the impact of ongoing global conflicts and financial instability. “Despite a strong landing of cephalopods last year, the export market struggled due to the wars in Gaza and Ukraine, as well as broader economic challenges,” Ibrahim explained. Cephalopods, including cuttlefish and squids, are significant export items from Goa. Cuttlefish production saw steady growth, increasing from 1,846 tonnes in 2022 to 2,252 tonnes in 2023. However, frozen cuttlefish exports fell dramatically, from 1,265 tonnes worth ₹3,813 lakh in 2018-19 to just 600 tonnes valued at ₹192 lakh in 2023-24. Similarly, frozen squid exports, while showing an increase in quantity—from 5,746 tonnes worth ₹12,216 lakh in 2018-19 to 18,399 tonnes worth ₹7,852 lakh in 2023-24—did not translate into higher profits. “The price of squids dropped by 35% this year, significantly impacting our profits,” Ibrahim noted. He also mentioned that European countries, traditionally major buyers, have reduced their cephalopod imports by nearly half since the pandemic, further straining the industry. The seafood sector in Goa is heavily labor-intensive, and Ibrahim called for export incentives, subsidies, and policy reforms to boost growth and competitiveness in the global market. Despite these challenges, certain categories within the seafood industry have shown resilience. The frozen fresh fish segment, for instance, experienced substantial growth, expanding from 24,289 tonnes valued at ₹33,843 lakh in 2018-19 to 60,949 tonnes worth ₹40,487 lakh in 2023-24. Frozen shrimp exports also saw impressive growth, with quantities jumping from 1,908 tonnes valued at ₹7,392 lakh in 2018-19 to 19,015 tonnes worth ₹5,035 lakh in 2022-23. As the industry grapples with these global pressures, the focus on adapting to changing consumer preferences and navigating geopolitical challenges will be crucial for the future of Goa’s seafood exports.

Read More
editor
Aquaculture Conservation Fish Feed Fisheries
0
45

Experts and Fishermen Advocate for Sustainable Practices Following Lift of Fishmeal Factory Moratorium

In the wake of the Marine Products Export Development Authority’s (MPEDA) decision to lift the moratorium on new fishmeal and fish oil factories, fishermen and marine experts have raised concerns about sustainability in India’s $7.38 billion marine food industry. The Indian Marine Ingredients Association (IMIA) welcomed this move, which they believe will revitalize the fishmeal industry, but stakeholders are urging stricter adherence to sustainable fishing practices. The moratorium, which had been in place since December 2019, was intended to control the expansion of fishmeal and fish oil production units. Its removal has sparked a debate on the long-term impact on marine resources, particularly regarding juvenile fishing. Mohamed Dawood Sait, president of IMIA, expressed optimism about the lifting of the moratorium, stating that it would provide much-needed capacity expansion in the fishmeal sector. “This decision is crucial for ensuring a sustainable future for India’s fishing and aquaculture industries,” said Sait. He emphasized that sustainability is a key concern for the industry, noting that Indian fisheries have remained resilient over the past 150 years without any species being driven to extinction. However, marine scientists and fishermen’s representatives have voiced their apprehensions. Sunil Mohammed, a retired marine scientist from the Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute in Kochi, stressed the importance of sustainability. “Without sustainability, both the fishmeal factories and the aquaculture industry face an uncertain future,” he cautioned. Charles George, representing the independent fishermen’s union Swathanthra Matsya Thozhilali Aikya Vedi, echoed these sentiments. He acknowledged the government’s support for aquaculture but questioned the decision to lift the ban on new fishmeal units without ensuring strict enforcement of marine fishing regulations. “The move is questionable unless the government enforces the existing regulations rigorously,” George added. Sait responded to these concerns by affirming the industry’s commitment to sustainability. He highlighted that the primary raw material for fishmeal production—small pelagic fish—is abundant in Indian waters, low in value, and less preferred for human consumption. He also pointed out the industry’s focus on waste management and resource conservation, converting by-products into valuable protein sources for aquaculture, poultry, and livestock. India’s fishmeal industry, the third-largest exporter globally, plays a significant role in the economy. However, experts insist that stricter implementation of fishing regulations is essential to protect marine resources. These regulations include the use of square mesh cod ends in trawl nets and adherence to minimum legal size requirements for 54 species of commercially important fish. As the debate continues, the call for balancing industrial growth with sustainable practices remains at the forefront of discussions within the marine food industry.

Read More
editor
Aquaculture Export Fisheries International Shrimp
0
7

Kerala’s Shrimp Export Crisis Deepens as Japan Cuts Imports: Implications for the Industry and Farmers

The shrimp export crisis in Kerala has reached a critical juncture following Japan’s recent decision to significantly reduce its imports of Indian shrimp. This development poses serious challenges for the state’s aquaculture sector, especially in the context of its dependence on the Japanese market, which has historically been a key destination for Kerala’s shrimp exports. The Importance of Japan as a Market Japan has long been one of the largest importers of seafood from India, with shrimp being a crucial component of its seafood consumption. The Japanese market is known for its high standards regarding quality and safety, making it both lucrative and challenging for exporters. In recent years, Indian shrimp, particularly from Kerala, has been favored due to its quality and flavor. However, the recent market dynamics have shifted dramatically. Reports indicate that Japan has begun sourcing shrimp from other countries like Ecuador and Vietnam, leading to a decline in demand for Indian shrimp. This shift is primarily attributed to increasing concerns over food safety and quality control issues associated with imports from India. Factors Contributing to the Export Crisis Several factors have led to the current crisis in Kerala’s shrimp export sector: Economic Implications for Kerala’s Farmers The impact of reduced exports to Japan is dire for Kerala’s shrimp farmers and the broader fishing community: Government and Industry Response In light of the crisis, both the Kerala government and industry stakeholders are taking steps to address the situation: Looking Ahead: The Future of Kerala’s Shrimp Industry While the immediate outlook for Kerala’s shrimp export industry appears challenging, there are opportunities for recovery and growth. By focusing on improving quality standards, embracing sustainable aquaculture practices, and diversifying export markets, the industry can adapt to the evolving global landscape. Furthermore, consumers worldwide are increasingly prioritizing sustainability and ethical sourcing, which Indian shrimp farmers can leverage by implementing responsible farming practices and obtaining relevant certifications. Conclusion The crisis facing Kerala’s shrimp exports to Japan underscores the fragility of the global seafood market and the need for adaptability in the face of shifting consumer preferences and regulatory environments. The actions taken by the government and industry stakeholders will be crucial in navigating these challenges and ensuring the long-term viability of the shrimp farming sector in Kerala. As the industry seeks to recover from this setback, its resilience and commitment to quality and sustainability will determine its future success in the competitive international seafood market.

Read More
editor
Aquaculture Fisheries News
0
7

Andhra Pradesh Leads the Way in Fishing and Aquaculture: A Deep Dive into India’s Aqua Sector

Andhra Pradesh has emerged as a dominant force in India’s fishing and aquaculture sector, accounting for an impressive 41% share of the country’s total fish production. This remarkable achievement not only underscores the state’s strategic geographic advantages but also highlights the concerted efforts of local authorities, farmers, and businesses in promoting sustainable aquaculture practices. A Thriving Industry The aquaculture industry in Andhra Pradesh has witnessed exponential growth over the past few decades, transforming the state into the leading producer of seafood in India. The state’s coastal line, which stretches over 972 kilometers along the Bay of Bengal, provides a conducive environment for marine and brackishwater aquaculture. With ideal climatic conditions and abundant water resources, Andhra Pradesh has capitalized on its geographic advantages to boost its aquaculture output significantly. Key Contributions to Fish Production As per the latest statistics, Andhra Pradesh produces approximately 3.6 million metric tons of fish annually, making it the largest fish-producing state in the country. Key species cultivated include: Government Initiatives and Support The Andhra Pradesh government has implemented several policies and schemes aimed at promoting the aquaculture sector. The Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana (PMMSY) is a flagship scheme that focuses on enhancing fish production, creating infrastructure, and ensuring sustainable practices. Key initiatives under the PMMSY include: Sustainable Practices and Certification With growing awareness around sustainability, Andhra Pradesh has also emphasized responsible aquaculture practices. The state’s farmers are increasingly adopting eco-friendly methods, such as Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA), which promotes biodiversity and enhances resource efficiency. Furthermore, initiatives like the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) certification are being embraced to ensure that aquaculture practices meet global sustainability standards. This not only helps in maintaining environmental balance but also enhances market access for farmers looking to export their products. Economic Impact and Livelihood Generation The fishing and aquaculture sector in Andhra Pradesh plays a pivotal role in the state’s economy. It not only generates substantial revenue but also provides livelihoods to millions of people, particularly in rural areas. Fish farming has become an essential source of income for many families, reducing poverty and improving the standard of living. The aquaculture industry has also led to the development of ancillary sectors, including feed manufacturing, processing, and logistics, creating additional employment opportunities. Challenges Ahead Despite its successes, the aquaculture sector in Andhra Pradesh faces several challenges: Looking Ahead: The Future of Aquaculture in Andhra Pradesh As Andhra Pradesh continues to lead India in fishing and aquaculture, the focus must remain on sustainable development and innovation. Embracing new technologies—such as artificial intelligence for monitoring fish health and automated feeding systems—will enhance productivity and efficiency. Moreover, fostering partnerships between the government, research institutions, and the private sector will be essential in addressing challenges and driving growth in this vital sector. In conclusion, Andhra Pradesh’s significant contribution to India’s fishing and aquaculture industry reflects a successful blend of natural resources, government support, and the resilience of local communities. With continued focus on sustainability and innovation, the state is well-positioned to maintain its leadership role and further bolster India’s aquaculture sector in the years to come.

Read More
editor
Business Data Focus Story Research Trade Value-added Seafood
0
94

Canned Sardines: A Surprisingly Lucrative Bite-Sized Business Boom

Move over tuna, there’s a new king of the canned fish aisle, and it’s swimming in a wave of popularity. The humble sardine, packed with nutrients and flavor, is experiencing a surge in demand, turning the canned sardine market into a surprisingly lucrative business opportunity. According to a recent study by Future Market Insights (FMI), the global canned sardine market is expected to surpass a value of US$ 8 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach a staggering US$ 16.8 billion by 2034. That’s a growth rate of a healthy 7.50% CAGR, driven by several key factors. Fueling the Fire: Health, Convenience, and Sustainability Consumers are increasingly health-conscious, and sardines are a nutritional powerhouse. Packed with vitamins, amino acids, and calcium, they offer a convenient and affordable way to add a dose of goodness to your diet. Long coastlines in countries like India, the United States, China, and Japan have always supported a strong culture of sardine consumption. But advancements in processing and preservation techniques are making canned sardines even more appealing. Export-oriented production by countries like Portugal and Spain is another growth factor. These established players are meeting the rising global demand, with support from a new wave of social media influencers promoting the “fish in a tin” trend. Sustainability is also playing a role. As eco-conscious consumers look for responsible choices, companies are embracing sustainable practices throughout the supply chain, from sourcing to packaging. This resonates with a growing segment of the market. Market Leaders and Top Trends The smoked sardine segment is the current champion, holding an expected market share of 58.60% in 2024. When it comes to distribution channels, hypermarkets and supermarkets reign supreme, with an anticipated share of 23.50% in 2024. Regionally, the canned sardine industry in India is poised for significant growth, with a projected CAGR of 7.30% through 2034. China and Japan are close behind, with growth estimates of 6.80% and 7.60% CAGR respectively. The United States and Germany are also expected to see steady growth. The competitive landscape is heating up as companies recognize the potential of this market. Key players are investing heavily to expand their consumer base and capitalize on this opportunity. The emergence of e-commerce platforms has further boosted sales, making it easier than ever for consumers to get their sardine fix. Some of the top names in the game include Wild Planet, Crown Prince, Santo Amaro, Brunswick, Matiz, MW Polar, and Ocean Price. These companies are not just focused on sales; they’re also committed to environmentally friendly fishing practices to meet the demands of sustainability-minded consumers. A Bite of Market Insights The FMI report delves deep into the various segments of the canned sardine market, providing valuable insights for potential investors and established players alike. Here’s a taste of what you’ll find: The Future is Fishy and Bright The canned sardine market is not just a passing fad; it’s a full-blown business boom driven by a confluence of factors. With health, convenience, and sustainability at the forefront, the future looks bright for this bite-sized wonder of the sea. Whether you’re a consumer looking for a nutritious and delicious snack or an entrepreneur seeking a lucrative opportunity, the canned sardine market is definitely worth diving into.

Read More
editor
Aquaculture Export Fisheries Shrimp
0
82

Indian Shrimp Industry Fights Back Against Allegations, Seeks Government Support

Indian shrimp exporters are facing accusations from a foreign lobby that their products are contaminated and produced using forced labor. This lobby is targeting the lucrative US market, where India has a 40% market share. The accusations stem from allegations by a former employee of a Kerala-based shrimp processing company, Choice Canning. The employee, a US citizen named Joshua Farinella, claimed the company was exporting shrimp with antibiotics and engaging in forced labor. These claims were amplified by activists and some US media outlets. Indian shrimp exporters vehemently deny these allegations. They have requested the government’s help in launching a global campaign to counter this negative publicity, which threatens to disrupt ₹43,000 crore of shrimp exports. In response, the Indian government convened a meeting with stakeholders from the commerce and external affairs ministries, regulatory bodies, and exporters. The exporters expressed confidence in meeting US safety standards and offered to open their facilities for inspection by independent international agencies. Government officials are confident that existing regulatory bodies like the Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA) and the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) are sufficient to ensure compliance. However, they have asked these agencies to be extra vigilant. India banned the use of antibiotics in aquaculture in 2002. To further address concerns, the government is encouraging exporters to focus on value addition through processing and branding before exporting to the US, a move that is believed to have rattled competitors. The Indian shrimp industry is not taking these accusations lightly. They point to a similar campaign that disrupted Thai seafood exports a decade ago. They are determined to protect their reputation and market share in the US, the world’s biggest shrimp buyer.

Read More
editor
Data Fisheries Focus Story News Research
0
86

New Study : India’s Seafood Consumption Projected to Double by 2048

A new study paints a promising picture for India’s seafood industry, predicting a significant rise in fish consumption within the next two and a half decades. The “Fish Consumption in India: Patterns and Trends” Study This research, conducted jointly by ICAR (Indian Council of Agricultural Research) and WorldFish, along with the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and various Indian government bodies, sheds light on the evolving dietary habits of the nation. The study examined fish consumption trends in India from 2005 to 2021. Find the original study here: [invalid URL removed] Key Findings: Benefits and Recommendations: The study emphasizes the importance of integrating fish consumption into public health and nutritional strategies, particularly considering the valuable contribution fish offers in terms of dietary needs. Dr. Arun Padiyar, WorldFish Country Lead for India, underlines the need for “holistic and adaptable policies” to strengthen fish value chains, ensuring the sustainability of aquatic food systems and promoting better nutritional outcomes for the population. India’s Position in Global Fisheries: While India is the world’s third-largest fish producer, contributing roughly 8% of global output, and holds the second position in aquaculture production, its per capita fish consumption ranking remains relatively low at 129th among 183 countries. Looking Ahead: The positive trend indicates a promising future for Indian seafood consumption. The study predicts that if current trends continue, fish consumption in India will double by 2048, reaching an estimated 26.50 million metric tons (MT). This growth is expected to be accompanied by a rise in per capita consumption to 16.07 kg annually. Dr. J.K. Jena, Deputy Director General (Fisheries Science) of ICAR, highlights the significance of ongoing research in understanding the complex interplay between fish consumption, socio-demographic factors, and economic realities at the household level. He emphasizes the critical role fish plays in ensuring food security and combating malnutrition, underscoring its importance for the nation’s overall well-being.

Read More
editor
Aquaculture Fisheries International Shrimp
0
81

India Refutes Labor Abuse Allegations in Booming Shrimp Industry

Top Exporter Faces Scrutiny, Vows to Maintain Standards India, now the world’s leading supplier of shrimp to the US, has vehemently denied allegations of human rights and environmental abuses raised by a Chicago-based human rights group. These accusations come at a time when India’s seafood export industry, particularly shrimp, is experiencing significant growth. Dominating the US Shrimp Market In 2022-23, India’s seafood exports reached a staggering $8.09 billion (₹64,000 crore), with shrimp accounting for a substantial portion at $5.6 billion. This dominance is further solidified by India’s rising share of the US shrimp market. In just one year, India’s share surged from 21% ($1.3 billion) to a commanding 40% ($2.4 billion) in 2022-23, surpassing major competitors like Thailand, China, Vietnam, and Ecuador. Dismissing Claims and Protecting Reputation A senior Indian Commerce Ministry official dismissed a report by the Corporate Accountability Lab (CAL) as “baseless.” This report raised concerns about working conditions within Indian shrimp hatcheries, farms, and processing facilities. The official emphasized that the entire value chain for India’s shrimp exports is stringently monitored and certified by the Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA), effectively eliminating opportunities for such concerns to affect overseas shipments. Furthermore, the official suggested that these allegations may be driven by “vested interests” aiming to undermine the reputation of India’s aquaculture sector and its products in international markets. Women: A Backbone of the Industry India’s shrimp industry provides vital employment opportunities, particularly in Andhra Pradesh, which holds the distinction of housing around one lakh shrimp farms and contributing to nearly 70% of the country’s total shrimp output. Women play a crucial role in this sector, comprising an estimated 70% of the workforce – from the two lakh positions in hatcheries and farms to the processing and freezing units. Upholding Standards and Addressing Concerns With the ambitious goal of scaling up seafood exports to ₹1 lakh crore by 2025-26, the Indian government is taking proactive measures. The Commerce Ministry may advise exporters to commission independent studies on working conditions within shrimp farms. This initiative aims to address concerns raised by major markets like the US and the EU and demonstrate India’s commitment to ethical practices. Additionally, the Ministry has requested that the Andhra Pradesh government investigate the specific allegations outlined in the CAL report, which highlight the potential existence of “dangerous and abusive conditions” for workers. The Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA) further emphasized that the CAL report unfairly presents isolated instances without thorough verification. They maintain that such selective reporting attempts to generalize practices across the entirety of India’s shrimp farming and processing sector. MPEDA officials reiterated India’s adherence to international regulations. Regular monitoring by Indian regulatory agencies, coupled with audits conducted by inspectors from the USFDA, European Commission, and the GAC of China, ensures compliance with international standards throughout the shrimp value chain. India’s booming shrimp industry faces a critical test in the wake of these allegations. The government’s commitment to upholding ethical practices and addressing concerns, along with independent studies and cooperation with state governments, will be crucial in maintaining its position as a leading global supplier of shrimp.

Read More
editor
Business Export Fisheries International News Trade
0
84

India Aims to Double Seafood Exports in Two Years, Debunking Safety Concerns

A senior Indian government official has outlined ambitious plans to significantly boost the country’s seafood export industry. The goal is to reach Rs 1 lakh crore (approximately $12.5 billion) within the next two years. This strategy hinges on increasing processing capacity and transitioning to higher value-added seafood products. The official, who declined to be named due to pre-election restrictions, emphasized the robust regulatory and safety regime governing Indian shrimp exports. This system ensures the quality of marine products shipped to developed regions like the US and Europe. 548 seafood processing units in India undergo regular inspections and monitoring by various government agencies. Debunking Safety Concerns The official strongly refuted recent reports alleging poor working conditions and safety standards within the Indian shrimp industry. These claims were deemed “wrong and baseless.” They further clarified that all processing units are registered with relevant authorities like MPEDA (Marine Products Export Development Authority), FSSAI (Food Safety and Standards Authority of India), and EIC (Export Inspection Council). Additionally, these units are subject to audits by international agencies like the US FDA and the European Commission, guaranteeing adherence to global standards. Strict Regulations and Monitoring India prioritizes food safety throughout the production and processing chain. The official highlighted the implementation of a HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point) based system in pre-processing and processing units, aligning with US regulations. Furthermore, the use of pharmacologically active substances in aquaculture has been banned since 2002. A comprehensive national framework safeguards against food safety hazards. This includes the National Residue Control Plan, ELISA screening labs, in-house labs, and pre-export checks. These measures ensure that antibiotic residues and other potential risks are eliminated from the product value chain, protecting consumer health. Building on a Strong Foundation India recently achieved record-breaking seafood exports in 2022-23, with a volume of 17.35 lakh tonnes valued at Rs 63,969.14 crore (USD 8.09 billion). Frozen shrimp remains the dominant export item, with the US and China being the primary importers. While exports dipped slightly in the initial months of the current fiscal year, the US continues to be the biggest market for Indian shrimp, accounting for 40% of the market share. Capturing Higher Value A significant portion of Indian shrimp destined for the US is currently processed in Latin American nations. The government aims to capture this value addition by establishing stronger domestic processing capabilities. This shift will not only generate higher export revenue but also create new opportunities within India. The Road Ahead With a focus on robust regulations, value-added products, and increased processing capacity, India’s plan to double its seafood exports in two years holds significant promise. This strategy could not only strengthen the economy but also empower local communities, particularly those heavily reliant on shrimp farming.

Read More
editor
Aquaculture Conservation Fisheries Focus Story Shrimp
0
86

Shrimp Concerns Shift From Thailand to India: Ethical and Sustainable Sourcing in Focus

The global appetite for shrimp has created a complex issue – balancing affordability with ethical and sustainable practices. While Thailand was once the poster child for these concerns, a new report by the Corporate Accountability Lab (CAL) shines a light on the rise of India’s shrimp industry and the potential issues it presents. India’s Rise and Mirrored Problems: India’s shrimp industry is a recent phenomenon, fueled by the introduction of whiteleg shrimp in 2009. This surge has come at a cost, mirroring the problems that plagued Thailand. CAL’s report, “Hidden Harvest,” reveals potential labor abuses, environmental damage, and the limitations of current certification programs. Labor Abuses a Recurring Theme: The report highlights concerning labor practices in India’s shrimp sector. Long hours, low wages, and unsafe working conditions are common. The system of outsourcing processing to small, unregistered facilities raises red flags for forced labor and exploitation, particularly of vulnerable populations. Environmental Impact a Growing Concern: Modern aquaculture can have significant environmental consequences. India’s shrimp industry is no exception. The construction of shrimp ponds has led to widespread mangrove destruction, impacting biodiversity and coastal protection. Additionally, runoff from these farms contaminates water sources and contributes to antibiotic resistance. Third-Party Certifications Under Scrutiny: The report questions the effectiveness of current third-party certification programs like Best Aquaculture Practices (BAP) and the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC). CAL suggests these certifications might not be adequately detecting or preventing abuses. A Call for Change: The report proposes a multi-pronged approach to address these issues. Major seafood buyers, including retailers and restaurants, need to re-evaluate their sourcing practices. Direct employment of workers with proper documentation and fair wages is crucial. Collaboration with worker-led organizations and enforceable agreements guaranteeing fair treatment are vital steps. Government Action Needed: Governments also have a role to play. India needs to enforce existing labor laws and strengthen regulations to effectively monitor the industry. The U.S. government can play a part by initiating trade investigations and strengthening traceability programs. Additionally, including Indian shrimp on the Department of Labor’s list of goods produced with forced labor would put pressure on the industry to clean up its act. The Future of Sustainable Shrimp: The race to the bottom for cheap shrimp is unsustainable. Consumers and industry players alike need to prioritize ethical and sustainable sourcing practices. Transparency, accountability, and collaboration throughout the supply chain are essential to ensure that the shrimp we enjoy comes at a fair price, not a human or environmental cost.

Read More
editor
Fisheries International Shrimp
0
71

Global Seafood Alliance Responds to Media Reports of BAP Standard Violations in India’s Shrimp Industry

March 26, 2024: Letter from GSA CEO Wally Stevens on India Shrimp Situation Speaking for everyone at the Global Seafood Alliance who dedicates their passion and experience to bring about positive change in the seafood industry, the recent reports of worker abuses in India’s shrimp supply chain are upsetting. A vision that we share – one of an industry acting responsibly with regards to its environmental impacts, food safety practices and social accountability – is why many of us chose to work for GSA. It’s also why it hurts so badly for many of us when the results of our efforts are called into question. My message to the seafood industry today is the same as it is to our employees: Be proud of the work that’s been done and be ready for the work that’s to come. Third-party certification is not an “unmitigated failure, hard stop,” as some claimed last week. There is no question that the global seafood industry is in a better place because of the influence of certification schemes like Best Aquaculture Practices. To call for an end to such an important mechanism is a shortsighted response. While third-party certification is a meaningful tool for supply chain managers to have greater insights into the types of operations that they source product from, it does have its limitations. Certification, however, was never going to be a miracle cure or a “golden shield” for all that ails us. It remains an effective device for buyers to vet their supply chains and a powerful incentive for aspirational producers everywhere. When GSA speaks about the need for continual improvement, we don’t only mean the work of seafood producers vying for certification – we hold ourselves to that standard as well. GSA is investigating internal processes, and we are committed to enhancing our standards, wherever and however necessary, and strengthening enforcement efforts wherever possible. When you disengage from a problem you cede your position to help solve it. GSA will not abandon its vision or its responsibilities in any area of the world where this kind of work is sorely needed simply because the challenge is too great. Sincerely, Wally Stevens, CEO March 21, 2024: GSA Issues Initial Response to Reports of BAP Standard Violations in India The Global Seafood Alliance is aware of and actively investigating recent allegations being made against shrimp producers in India, including those holding Best Aquaculture Practices (BAP) certificates. “We are committed to our mission of promoting responsible practices in the seafood supply chain and take these matters seriously,” said Wally Stevens, the CEO of GSA. “BAP requires all certified seafood production facilities – aquaculture farms, hatcheries, feed mills and processing plants – to strictly adhere to robust social accountability, food safety, environmental responsibility, and animal welfare aspects of our global certification standards. Facilities found to have violated BAP standards will have their certifications suspended and potentially revoked.” Credible evidence of a BAP standard violation initiates an investigation, and the procedure is managed by the GSA Program Integrity department with the involvement of specialized and impartial third-party investigators. This process is currently under way to explore the validity of alleged violations that were reported this week by the Associated Press, The Outlaw Ocean Project, and the Corporate Accountability Lab, and to strengthen procedures to help prevent future violations. The organization stands behind the integrity of its standards and feels that these requirements have meaningful positive impacts, and is constantly evaluating the depth and breadth of its certification portfolio. GSA welcomes collaboration with other organizations to not only review the allegations in India, but to also develop and implement improvements for certification processes. BAP standards are maintained under a rigorous internationally recognized process that includes an expert technical committee for standard development, a 60-day public comment period where all comments are reviewed and addressed, and approval by a 12- to 15-member Standards Oversight Committee consisting of one-third academia, one-third industry, and one-third NGO experts. Additional detailed information about the BAP standards can be found here. Assessments are conducted by accredited third-party certification bodies at least once per year. Facilities must meet all standard criteria and correct all non-conformities before certification is granted. GSA monitors FDA import alerts and news reports and investigates all complaints and allegations to safeguard that auditors, certification bodies, and facilities adhere to program requirements. Severe non-conformities and those that are not resolved within a specified timeframe result in suspension from the BAP program. GSA and its standards have developed over time to address a variety of issues and areas for improvement. The organization is committed to its mission to advance responsible seafood practices through education, advocacy, and third-party assurances that the world’s leading retailers, foodservice operators, and all seafood consumers deserve.

Read More
editor
Aquaculture Giudance Research
0
75

New Course by ICAR-CIBA and ICAR-CIFE, Equips Professionals for Risk Management in India’s Shrimp Industry

The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) is taking a step forward in risk management for the country’s growing shrimp farming industry. Through its institutions, the Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture (CIBA) and the Central Institute of Fisheries Education (CIFE), ICAR has launched a new “Certificate Course on Shrimp Crop Insurance & Loss Assessment.” India’s Rise in Shrimp Farming: With a vast coastline and a focus on export markets, India has seen a significant rise in shrimp farming since the 1970s. However, this lucrative venture also carries inherent risks. The new course aims to equip professionals with the knowledge and skills necessary to mitigate those risks. Course Objectives: The program offers participants a comprehensive understanding of: By delving into risk assessment, documentation, and claims management, the course empowers participants to navigate the complexities of insuring shrimp crops effectively. Who Should Attend? This comprehensive program is designed for a diverse audience, including: Focus on Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing: The course prioritizes industry collaboration and knowledge dissemination. While open to all on a first-come, first-served basis, priority will be given to candidates nominated and sponsored by industry and government entities. Limited Enrollment and Application Process: With a maximum of 30 participants, interested individuals are encouraged to apply early. The application process involves completing a form and submitting payment details. This new course from ICAR-CIBA and ICAR-CIFE provides a valuable opportunity for professionals to gain the expertise needed to manage risks and ensure the continued growth of India’s shrimp farming industry.

Read More
editor
Blog Fisheries News Shrimp
0
79

MPEDA Chairman Rejects Criticism, Calls Shrimp Industry “Guilt-Free”

Dodda Venkata Swamy, chairman of India’s Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA), is pushing back against recent media reports and NGO allegations regarding labor abuses, unsanitary conditions, and food safety violations in the Indian shrimp industry. Swamy maintains that India produces “guilt-free seafood” and boasts a “robust regulatory framework” with “stringent checks and controls” ensuring compliance with international standards. He emphasizes regular monitoring and inspections conducted by Indian authorities. However, the claims are in stark contrast to recent reports. The Need for Transparency: While Swamy’s defense highlights India’s efforts toward regulation, the weight of recent reports necessitates further investigation. Addressing the concerns and ensuring transparent practices will be crucial to maintaining consumer trust in Indian seafood exports. Potential Impact: These controversies could impact the reputation of Indian shrimp in the global market. Major importers like the US, already scrutinizing labor practices, might take stricter measures if concerns are not adequately addressed. Looking Ahead: Independent investigations and collaboration between industry leaders, regulatory bodies, and NGOs are essential for ensuring ethical and sustainable practices in the Indian shrimp industry. Only then can India truly claim its seafood is “guilt-free.”

Read More
editor
International News
0
93

Sustainable Seafood Certifier ASC Exits China, Raising Concerns About Industry Practices

The Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC), a leading organization promoting responsible fish farming practices, is pulling out of China. This move comes amidst growing scrutiny of seafood certification bodies and concerns about ethical and sustainable practices in the industry, particularly in Asia. Strategic Retreat or Deeper Issues? The ASC announced their decision after an 18-month review, stating they will “phase out program operations and cease investment” in China. While the organization emphasizes a desire to focus resources on areas with greater impact, the lack of detailed explanation has sparked speculation. Limited Transparency and Remaining Concerns ASC currently certifies only 30 farms in China, primarily bivalve and tilapia producers. This stands in stark contrast to their competitor, the Global Seafood Alliance (GSA), which has a larger presence in the country. The GSA, in a recent newsletter, reiterated their commitment to all regions, suggesting a difference in approach to tackling challenges in the Chinese market. Industry-Wide Scrutiny: This news coincides with recent media investigations highlighting lapses in seafood supply chain oversight. Both ASC and GSA are currently investigating allegations of worker mistreatment and food safety violations in India’s shrimp processing industry. The Future of Sustainable Aquaculture: The ASC’s exit from China raises questions about the effectiveness of certification programs in ensuring ethical and sustainable aquaculture practices. Increased transparency, stricter enforcement measures, and collaboration within the industry are likely to be crucial in rebuilding consumer trust and ensuring the responsible growth of the aquaculture sector.

Read More